Fireon Live — Multi-Host Streaming Platform

The problem

Live streaming platforms aren't really video products — they're marketplaces. Hosts stream because they earn; agencies recruit and manage rosters of hosts for a cut; the platform needs visibility into all of it. Fireon Live needed multi-host streaming rooms plus the entire economic layer: earnings, hierarchies, and dashboards for three different kinds of user.

What I built

The streaming, and the business machinery around the streaming.

• Multi-host rooms. Multiple hosts share one live room — co-hosting, seat management, join and leave flows — with the audience watching the combined stream. Real-time seat state stays consistent even when hosts drop mid-session.
• Host earnings. Every gift and paid interaction is tracked to the receiving host. Hosts see their earnings in-app: today, this period, all-time — earnings visibility is the product's retention loop for the supply side.
• Agency structure. Agencies onboard hosts, track their roster's performance, and see aggregated earnings. This hierarchy — platform → agency → host — ran through the data model from day one, because retrofitting it later is a rewrite.
• Dashboards. Admin and agency dashboards for the operations no one sees: host approval, payout review, content moderation, and platform-level analytics.

Outcome

Fireon Live shipped as a complete streaming operation: hosts stream and see what they earn, agencies manage rosters with real numbers, and the platform operates from dashboards instead of spreadsheets.

This is what "full product" means in practice — see full stack development, or compare with Kalise, the single-host predecessor.